Criar o que é possível no cuidado de feridas.

O portfólio de produtos para o Tratamento Avançado de Feridas da Smith+Nephew oferece soluções abrangentes para satisfazer necessidades clínicas amplas e complexas e para ajudar os profissionais de saúde a reduzir o impacto humano e os custos económicos das feridas.

Estas incluem produtos para a prevenção e o tratamento de feridas agudas e crónicas, tais como úlceras de perna, diabéticas e de pressão, queimaduras e feridas pós-operatórias.

Contacte-nos
Header GNEAUPP -500x500 only nurse.png

PICO Terapia de pressão negativa

Ativar a cicatrização de feridas que não cicatrizam... é possível com PICO◊13

Altere a trajetória das feridas de difícil cicatrização com o PICO e consiga uma cicatrização mais eficaz.

O sistema de Terapia para Feridas por Pressão Negativa (TFPN) de utilização única PICO tem uma forte base de evidência. Até à data, foram identificadas 316* publicações sobre o sistema de TFPN de uso único PICO.

Incentivamo-lo a conhecer as evidências, desde os resultados clínicos à satisfação dos doentes e à poupança de recursos.

Referencias
  1. Forni C, Searle R. A multilayer polyurethane foam dressing for pressure ulcer prevention in older hip fracture patients: an economic evaluation. J Wound Care. 2020;29(2):120-127. doi:10.12968/JOWC.2020.29.2.120
  2. Smith+Nephew. Internal Report. CSD. AWM.22.045 .; 2022.
  3. Moore Z, Loney A, Probst S, et al. 3.5 billion hours of nurse time released by 2030: Potential efficiency gains from shared care and long-wear advanced foam dressings. Wounds International. 2022;13(2):10-16.
  4. Dowsett C, Hampton J, Myers D, Styche T. Use of PICOTM to improve clinical and economic outcomes in hard-to-heal wounds. Wounds International. 2017;8(2):52-58. www.woundsinternational.com
  5. Kirsner R, Dove C, Reyzelman A, Vayser D, Jaimes H. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system, compared to traditional negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic ulcers of the lower extremities. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27(5):519-529. doi:10.1111/WRR.12727
  6. Hurd T. Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Innovations in Chronic Wound Care Products and Practices. Published online 2013.
  7. Hudson DA, Adams KG, Van Huyssteen A, et al. Simplified negative pressure wound therapy: clinical evaluation of an ultraportable, no-canister system. Int Wound J. 2015;12(2):195-201. doi:10.1111/IWJ.12080
  8. Hurd T, Trueman P, Rossington A. Use of a portable, single-use negative pressure wound therapy device in home care patients with low to moderately exuding wounds: a case series. Ostomy Wound Management. 2014;60(3):30-36.
  9. Gilchrist B, Robinson M, Jaimes H. Performance, safety, and efficacy of a single use negative pressure wound therapy system for surgically closed incision sites and skin grafts: A prospective multi-centre follow-up study. Published online 2020.
  10. Smith & Nephew March 2018.Kendal PICO 7Y - pump weight and dimensions. Internal Report. DS.18.066.R.
  11. Smith & Nephew 2018.PICO 14 Pump weight and dimensions. Internal Report. RD/18/137.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

i Manufacturer's IFU should always be consulted.
ii “Bigger smiles” refers to patient “overall satisfaction” score, where 87.6% of PICO sNPWT patients agreed or strongly agreed they were satisfied vs. 68.9% of tNPWT patients
iii With a training regime
iv Compared to baseline with standard dressings14 and vs tNPWT15
v n=17 This is for wounds less than three months in duration. This is wounds classified as on a healing trajectory, not necessarily 'success'

Title

Text

Explore