SL-PLUS_164985.png

Excellent clinical performance

A dual-tapered straight stem with a rectangular cross-section offers a successful biological anchoring concept to suit a variety of bone morphologies; 1-7 shown to provide excellent results for survivorship, resisting implant loosening, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiolucent lines.1-6,8

Cortical support at the edges is designed to provide excellent primary anchorage, with a rounded taper at the prosthesis tip – which transitions smoothly into a pyramid shaped tip - designed to minimise tension peaks in the distal diaphyseal area.

Medical Education

No results.
No results.

Disclaimer

*Compared to the SL-PLUS Primary Stem.
**As demonstrated in laboratory testing.

It is the responsibility of the treating physicians to determine and utilize the appropriate products and techniques according to their own clinical judgement for each of their patients. For detailed information, including indications for use, contraindications, effects, precautions and warnings, please consult the product’s Instructions for Use (IFU) prior to use.

Products may not be available in all markets because product availability is subject to the regulatory and/or medical practices in individual markets. Please contact your Smith+Nephew representative or distributor if you have questions about the availability of Smith+Nephew products in your area.

Trademark of Smith+Nephew. All trademarks acknowledged. ©2022 Smith+Nephew. All rights reserved.

Citations

1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) 2021. Automated Industry Report (AIRS) ID 4082 - SL-PLUS INTEGRATION PLUS MIA Stem (Combined Standard and Lateral). Adelaide.

2. Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS) 2021. SIRIS Industry Report for Smith+Nephew SL-PLUS INTEGRATION PLUS MIA Stem. Bern.

3. Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD) 2021. Data Summary for SL-PLUS INTEGRATION MIA Stem (H1.5 Femoral Component). Berlin.

4. Smith+Nephew 2019. Internal report. Study D10080-2.

5. Reiner T, et al. J Clin Med. 2020;9(7):1-10.

6. Tanaka A, et al. Musculoskelet Surg. 2019;104(3):313-320.

7. Hofstaedter T, et al. Arthroplas Today. 2020;6(4):819-824.

8. Tezuka T, et al. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020.

9. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) 2021. Automated Industry Report (AIRS) ID 4267 - SL-PLUS INTEGRATION PLUS MIA Stem Standard. Adelaide.

10. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) 2021. Automated Industry Report (AIRS) ID 4266 - SL-PLUS INTEGRATION PLUS MIA Stem Lateral. Adelaide.

11. Affatato S, et al. Int Orthop. 2016;40(11):2261-2269.

12. Korovessis P, et al. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2011;131(5):603-611.

13. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man 2021. 18th Annual Report. Hertfordshire.

14. Junk-Jantsch S, et al. In: Bioceramics and Alternative Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty: Springer; 2007.

15. Pflüger G, et al. EFORT-Poster. 2007.

16. Brandenberg J, et al. OUP. 2012;1(5):208.

17. Strnad Z, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;15(4):483-490.

18. Zheng X, et al. Biomaterials. 2000;21(8):841-849.

19. Dr. Hans Schmotzer SU. Aarau, Switzerland: PI Precision Implants; 2000.

20. Lintner F, et al. In: 25 years of biologic fixation: K. Zweymuller München: Elsevier/Urban & Fischer; 2007:155-160.

Title

Text