PICO◊ 14 Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System
Designed to treat closed surgical incisions and hard-to-heal wounds with an enhanced pump facilitating use for up to 14 days with less user intervention.*1-3 It is increasingly used prophylactically on at-risk patients undergoing complex or high-consequence surgery
Powerful results in complex wounds
Featuring a proprietary AIRLOCK◊ Technology dressing with Soft Port and integrated filter, PICO 14 sNPWT is indicated for:
- Large wounds - shown to help the contraction of large wounds,** such as pressure ulcers (PUs), venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), while helping to stimulate the formation of granulation tissue3-10
- Surgical incisions - shown to reduce lateral tension***11 and may help to reduce oedema12-14 - while promoting lymphatic drainage****15 - with a gentle silicone helping to minimise trauma and pain in the peri-wound area on dressing removal.6-18
Product features
Application
Evidence and case studies
Related technologies
Medical Education
No results.
Disclaimer
*Compared to the PICO 7 System.
**Wounds greater than 2cm must use a wound filler alongside PICO sNPWT. Usage time and user intervention is in comparison with previous versions.
***As demonstrated in biomechanical modelling.
****As demonstrated in vivo.
*****As demonstrated in benchtop testing.
Citations
- Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/132.
- Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal report EO AWM. PCS230.001 v2.
- Smith+Nephew 2019. Internal report. RD/19/084.
- Kirsner R, et al. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2019;27(5):519 - 529.
- Hurd T, et al. Paper presented at: Symposium on Advanced Wound Care/Wound Healing Society Meeting; 2020; Abu Dhabi.
- Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. EO.AWM.PCS230.001.v2.
- Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/089 V2.
- Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/132.
- Brownhill VR, et al. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2020;0(0):1 - 12.
- Schwartz JA, et al. J Wound Care. 2015;24(2).
- Loveluck J, et al. ePlasty. 2016;16:183-195.
- Birke-Sorensen H, et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64 Suppl:S1-16.
- Kamolz LP, et al. Burns. 2004;30(3):253-258.
- Molnar JA, et al. J Burns Wounds. 2005;4:83-92.
- Kilpadi DV, et al. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19(5):588-596.
- Payne C, et al. ePlasty. 2014:152-166.
- Stryja J, et al. Prolekare. 2015;94(8):322 - 328.
- Smith+Nephew 2015. Internal Report. ST865 CT09/02.
- Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/131.
- Gilchrist B, et al. Paper presented at: SAWC; 2020; Virtual.
- Smith+Nephew 2020. Internal Report. 2001002.
- Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. DS.18.066.R.
- Sharpe A, et al. Wounds UK. 2018;14:89-93.
- Myers D, et al. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2018; Krakow.
- Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/136.
- Casey C. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2019; Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Karlakki SL, et al. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5(8):328-337.
- Dingemans SA, et al. Int Orthop. 2018;42(4):747-753.
- Clark JM, et al. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;48(1):21.