RENASYS TOUCH for header

Clinically comparable to V.A.C.

Simplify care and save on costs, without compromising on performance.

The performance of RENASYS tNPWT is clinically comparable to V.A.C., with the compelling addition of innovative features designed to improve the lives of patients and their clinicians.3

A large retrospective study found no significant difference in patients reaching their predetermined treatent goal between the two systems, demonstrating that they are comparable in treating complex wounds.4

RENASYS and 3M icons

See how S+N will be with you every step of the way in implementing change.

Review
Assesment of existing account protocols
Plan
Collaboration to ensure needs are met
Implement
Training and support, at any time
Monitor
Ongoing evaluation and development

 

RENASYS Soft Port

The RENASYS Soft Port offers simplified dressing application across various wound types, anywhere on the body.

Soft Port image

Fast, easy, versatile

Simpler and quicker to use than hard port alternatives, the RENASYS Soft Port can be applied and removed with minimal pain in even the most difficult-to-treat contours of the body for an improved patient experience.5,6


Putting the patient first

Soft Port is compatible with all RENASYS systems and is specifically designed to improve application and patient comfort.5,6

Soft Port saves time and resources when applied to awkward areas of the body, and may help reduce the need for complex bridging.6,7

RENASYS Soft Port on foot

RENASYS TOUCH designed to make a difference for application and patient comfort

Click on body parts to see application of Soft Port.

Experience from an expert

WOC Nurse for 600-bed, level 2 trauma center speaks of her experience with the RENASYS System and her love for Soft Port.

RENASYS EDGE and TOUCH
RENASYS Family
Learn more

 

A older woman smiling
POST-ACUTE
Learn more

 

A couple smiling at each other
PATIENT
Learn more

 

Citations
  1. Smith+Nephew 2022. RENASYS EDGE System Human Factors Summative Report Summary. Internal Report, CSD.AWM.22.071.
  2. Smith+Nephew 2022. Summary of footprint, portability, wearability, weight and audible noise for the RENASYS EDGE System. Internal Report. CSD.AWM.22.067.
  3. Forlee M, Richardson J, Rossington A, Cockwill J, Smith J. An interim analysis of device functionality and usability of RENASYS™ TOUCH – a new portable Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) system. Paper presented at: Wounds UK; 2016; Harrogate, UK.
  4. Hurd T, Rossington A, Trueman P, Smith J. A Retrospective Comparison of the Performance of Two Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems in the Management of Wounds of Mixed Etiology. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017;6(1):33-37.
  5. Smith+Nephew 2012. A prospective, open, non-comparative, multi-centre study to evaluate the functionality and device performance of a new Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) suction port (RENASYS Soft Port) in the management of acute, sub-acute and chronic wounds. Internal Report. CT/US/11/01.
  6. Carnali M, Ronchi R, Finocchi L, Spuri Capesciotti S, Paggi B. Retrospective study on the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of pilonidal cysts (sinus pilonidalis) operated on using an open technique or complicated by dehiscence of the surgery site through sepsis. Acta Vulnologica 2016;14(1):24 - 40.
  7. Hudson D, Adams K, Cockwill J, Smith J. Evaluation of a new Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) suction port (RENASYS◊ Soft Port). Paper presented at: EWMA; 2013.

*n=96; Compared to alternative port

Title

Text