840x840-PX-PICO-7-Global.png

Unique dressing technology

Through a unique dressing design and an innovative pump, PICO sNPWT has been shown to reduce lateral tension*8 and may help to reduce oedema9-11 - while promoting lymphatic drainage**12 - with a gentle silicone contact layer helping to minimise trauma and pain in the peri-wound area on dressing removal.13-15

Indicated for use on:

  • Surgically closed incision sites
  • Acute, traumatic, subacute and dehisced wounds
  • Chronic wounds and ulcers (such as diabetic or pressure)
  • Partial-thickness burns, flaps and grafts
PICO 7 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Patient

Product features

Ordering Information

Code  Product description  Items per unit 
 Two dressings and one pump kits
 66802002  10cm x 20cm  1 Kit
 66802003  10cm x 30cm  1 Kit
 66802004  10cm x 40cm  1 Kit
 66802005  15cm x 15cm  1 Kit
 66802006  15cm x 20cm  1 Kit
 66802007  15cm x 30cm  1 Kit
 66802008  20cm x 20cm  1 Kit
 66802009  25cm x 25cm  1 Kit
 66802000  Multisite 15cm x 20cm  1 Kit
 66802001  Multisite 20cm x 25cm  1 Kit
 66802031  7Y Multisite 20cm x 25cm  1 Kit
 One dressing and one pump kits
 66802012  10cm x 20cm  1 Kit
 66802013  10cm x 30cm  1 Kit
 66802014  10cm x 40 cm  1 Kit
 Accessories
 66801021  Foam Filler 10cm x 12cm x 1.5cm  Pack/5
 66802127  Gauze Dressing Filler 11.4cm x 3.7m  Pack/5

Disclaimer

*As demonstrated in biomechanical modelling.

**Demonstrated in vivo.

***As demonstrated in benchtop testing.

Citations

1. Hudson DA, et al. Int Wound J. 2015;12(2):195-201.

2. Smith+Nephew 2019. Internal Report. RD/18/134 V2.

3. Smith+Nephew 2017. Internal Report. DS/17/253/R.

4. Saunders C, et al. BJS open. 2021 Jan;5(1):zraa003.

5. Casey C. Consistent delivery of therapeutic negative pressure levels by a single use negative pressure wound therapy system (sNPWT)* in a wound model. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2019; Gothenburg, Sweden.

6. Kirsner R, et al. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27(5):519 - 529.

7. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. DS.18.260.R.

8. Loveluck J, et al. ePlasty. 2016;16:183-195.

9. Birke-Sorensen H, et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64 Suppl:S1-16.

10. Kamolz LP, et al. Burns. 2004;30(3):253-258.

11. Molnar JA, et al. J Burns Wounds. 2005;4:83-92.

12. Kilpadi DV, et al. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19(5):588-596.

13. Payne C, et al. ePlasty. 2014:152-166.

14. Stryja J, et al. Prolekare. 2015;94(8):322 - 328.

15. Smith+Nephew 2015. Internal Report. ST865 CT09/02.

16. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/131.

17. Gilchrist B, et al. Performance, safety, and efficacy of a single use negative pressure wound therapy system for surgically closed incision sites and skin grafts: A prospective multi-centre follow-up study. Paper presented at: SAWC; 2020; Virtual.

18. Smith+Nephew 2020. Internal Report. 2001002.

19. Smith+Nephew. Internal Report. RD/18/137.

20. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. DS.18.066.R.

21. Karlakki SL, et al. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5(8):328-337.

22. Dingemans SA, et al. Int Orthop. 2018;42(4):747-753.

23. Clark JM, et al. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;48(1):21.

24. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/136.

25. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/133.

Title

Text